learner status Search Results


90
SAS institute super learner computational macro (arxiv:1805.08058 [stat.ml])
Super Learner Computational Macro (Arxiv:1805.08058 [Stat.Ml]), supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/super learner computational macro (arxiv:1805.08058 [stat.ml])/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
super learner computational macro (arxiv:1805.08058 [stat.ml]) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Coursera Inc learner status
Learner Status, supplied by Coursera Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/learner status/product/Coursera Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
learner status - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc english learner el status nslp status
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
English Learner El Status Nslp Status, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/english learner el status nslp status/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
english learner el status nslp status - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
STATA Corporation version 16 1
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
Version 16 1, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/version 16 1/product/STATA Corporation
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
version 16 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
STATA Corporation learner asset scale
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
Learner Asset Scale, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/learner asset scale/product/STATA Corporation
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
learner asset scale - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Kaneka Corp state required metrics
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
State Required Metrics, supplied by Kaneka Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/state required metrics/product/Kaneka Corp
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
state required metrics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
STATA Corporation learner age
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
Learner Age, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/learner age/product/STATA Corporation
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
learner age - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
National Research Council Canada learners across k 12 education
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
Learners Across K 12 Education, supplied by National Research Council Canada, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/learners across k 12 education/product/National Research Council Canada
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
learners across k 12 education - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MathWorks Inc image processing toolbox
Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)
Image Processing Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/image processing toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
image processing toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)

Journal: AERA open

Article Title: Eighth Grade Algebra Course Placement and Student Motivation for Mathematics

doi: 10.1177/2332858415625227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive statistics for full (N=4,229 students) and study samples (N=3,306 students)

Article Snippet: The differences, however, are small in magnitude. table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Full sample Study sample obs. mean/ % SD obs. mean/ % SD p-value of difference Gender Male 2,051 48.5% 1,593 48.2% 0.48 Race/ethnicity White 423 10.0% 331 10.0% 0.96 Hispanic 2,888 68.3% 2,226 67.3% 0.01* Vietnamese 571 13.5% 470 14.2% 0.01* Other 351 8.30% 281 8.50% 0.38 Free/reduced lunch (NSLP) and English Learner (EL) status NSLP status 3,180 75.2% 2,474 74.8% 0.15 EL status 2,051 48.5% 1,587 48.0% 0.33 Prior math achievement (CST scaled score) 7th grade 4,229 337 60.6 3,306 341 60.7 0.00*** Prior math achievement bins High achievement 1,594 37.7% 1,302 39.4% 0.00*** Average achievement 1,362 32.2% 1081 32.7% 0.10 Low achievement 1,273 30.1% 922 27.9% 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Fall Mastery 3,500 3.71 0.92 3,089 3.73 0.91 0.00*** Performance approach 3,522 2.49 1.06 3,101 2.50 1.06 0.18 Performance avoid 3,560 2.44 1.01 3,083 2.43 1.01 0.12 Self-efficacy 3,525 3.32 0.89 3,103 3.34 0.87 0.01** Task value 3,531 3.44 0.64 3,108 3.46 0.64 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Spring Mastery 3,602 3.50 1.00 3,273 3.50 1.00 0.25 Performance approach 3,630 2.21 0.99 3,297 2.18 0.98 0.00*** Performance avoid 3,619 1.94 0.91 3,289 1.91 0.98 0.00*** Self-efficacy 3,636 3.23 0.94 3,302 3.24 0.90 0.02* Task value 3,636 3.31 0.66 3,303 3.31 0.66 0.46 Open in a separate window Note .

Techniques:

Descriptive statistics for study sample by eighth grade course placement (N=3,306 students)

Journal: AERA open

Article Title: Eighth Grade Algebra Course Placement and Student Motivation for Mathematics

doi: 10.1177/2332858415625227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive statistics for study sample by eighth grade course placement (N=3,306 students)

Article Snippet: The differences, however, are small in magnitude. table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Full sample Study sample obs. mean/ % SD obs. mean/ % SD p-value of difference Gender Male 2,051 48.5% 1,593 48.2% 0.48 Race/ethnicity White 423 10.0% 331 10.0% 0.96 Hispanic 2,888 68.3% 2,226 67.3% 0.01* Vietnamese 571 13.5% 470 14.2% 0.01* Other 351 8.30% 281 8.50% 0.38 Free/reduced lunch (NSLP) and English Learner (EL) status NSLP status 3,180 75.2% 2,474 74.8% 0.15 EL status 2,051 48.5% 1,587 48.0% 0.33 Prior math achievement (CST scaled score) 7th grade 4,229 337 60.6 3,306 341 60.7 0.00*** Prior math achievement bins High achievement 1,594 37.7% 1,302 39.4% 0.00*** Average achievement 1,362 32.2% 1081 32.7% 0.10 Low achievement 1,273 30.1% 922 27.9% 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Fall Mastery 3,500 3.71 0.92 3,089 3.73 0.91 0.00*** Performance approach 3,522 2.49 1.06 3,101 2.50 1.06 0.18 Performance avoid 3,560 2.44 1.01 3,083 2.43 1.01 0.12 Self-efficacy 3,525 3.32 0.89 3,103 3.34 0.87 0.01** Task value 3,531 3.44 0.64 3,108 3.46 0.64 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Spring Mastery 3,602 3.50 1.00 3,273 3.50 1.00 0.25 Performance approach 3,630 2.21 0.99 3,297 2.18 0.98 0.00*** Performance avoid 3,619 1.94 0.91 3,289 1.91 0.98 0.00*** Self-efficacy 3,636 3.23 0.94 3,302 3.24 0.90 0.02* Task value 3,636 3.31 0.66 3,303 3.31 0.66 0.46 Open in a separate window Note .

Techniques:

Descriptive statistics for overlap only sample (N=529 students)

Journal: AERA open

Article Title: Eighth Grade Algebra Course Placement and Student Motivation for Mathematics

doi: 10.1177/2332858415625227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive statistics for overlap only sample (N=529 students)

Article Snippet: The differences, however, are small in magnitude. table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Full sample Study sample obs. mean/ % SD obs. mean/ % SD p-value of difference Gender Male 2,051 48.5% 1,593 48.2% 0.48 Race/ethnicity White 423 10.0% 331 10.0% 0.96 Hispanic 2,888 68.3% 2,226 67.3% 0.01* Vietnamese 571 13.5% 470 14.2% 0.01* Other 351 8.30% 281 8.50% 0.38 Free/reduced lunch (NSLP) and English Learner (EL) status NSLP status 3,180 75.2% 2,474 74.8% 0.15 EL status 2,051 48.5% 1,587 48.0% 0.33 Prior math achievement (CST scaled score) 7th grade 4,229 337 60.6 3,306 341 60.7 0.00*** Prior math achievement bins High achievement 1,594 37.7% 1,302 39.4% 0.00*** Average achievement 1,362 32.2% 1081 32.7% 0.10 Low achievement 1,273 30.1% 922 27.9% 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Fall Mastery 3,500 3.71 0.92 3,089 3.73 0.91 0.00*** Performance approach 3,522 2.49 1.06 3,101 2.50 1.06 0.18 Performance avoid 3,560 2.44 1.01 3,083 2.43 1.01 0.12 Self-efficacy 3,525 3.32 0.89 3,103 3.34 0.87 0.01** Task value 3,531 3.44 0.64 3,108 3.46 0.64 0.00*** 8th grade motivational measures, Spring Mastery 3,602 3.50 1.00 3,273 3.50 1.00 0.25 Performance approach 3,630 2.21 0.99 3,297 2.18 0.98 0.00*** Performance avoid 3,619 1.94 0.91 3,289 1.91 0.98 0.00*** Self-efficacy 3,636 3.23 0.94 3,302 3.24 0.90 0.02* Task value 3,636 3.31 0.66 3,303 3.31 0.66 0.46 Open in a separate window Note .

Techniques: